25 research outputs found

    VALUING BOTANIC COLLECTIONS: A COMBINED TRAVEL-COST AND CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEY IN AUSTRALIA

    Get PDF
    The economic value of biological collections in three major botanic gardens in Australia was estimated using the Travel-Cost (TC) and Contingent Valuation (CV) methods. The study used truncated count data models to control for the non-negative integer and truncation properties of the number of visits to botanic gardens in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney. We estimate consumer surplus values of approximately 34pertriptoeachbotanicgarden,resultinginthetotalsocialwelfareestimateofapproximately34 per trip to each botanic garden, resulting in the total social welfare estimate of approximately 96.9 million in 2010 Australian dollars. This result is relatively high compared to similar studies conducted in other countries. Willingness to pay (WTP) for entry fees and or higher parking charges for access to botanic gardens were also investigated. Results indicate a positive mean WTP of approximately 33-4 per trip per person. These findings will be useful for resource management decisions in the botanic gardens and other biological collections in Australia.Economic value, botanic gardens, biological collections, willingness to pay, travel-cost method, contingent valuation method., Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

    Valuing access to biological collections with contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis

    No full text
    Biological collections may be underutilised because of transaction costs incurred in their use. One way to reduce transaction costs and foster greater utilisation of biological collections that could benefit society is through the creation of a virtual central database of biological collections, available online. The objective of this paper is to estimate the benefits of this policy change using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation survey of the primary users of biological collections. Marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for access to a new central database linking collections around Australia was investigated through an annual user fee payment vehicle. The mean WTP of direct users of the proposed program was Australian dollar (A)149perannum(95confidenceintervalof) 149 per annum (95% confidence interval of 102 $348). We conducted a cost benefit analysis of the proposal, showing that the aggregate benefits are likely to outweigh the total costs of setting up and maintaining the database in the longer term. These findings are useful for resource allocation decisions regarding biological collections

    Valuing Australian botanic collections: A combined travel-cost and contingent valuation study

    No full text
    Economic values of biological collections in three Australian botanic gardens in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney were estimated using the travel-cost method (TCM) and the contingent valuation method (CVM). The TCM component of the study produced average per-trip consumer surplus (CS) values of 39and39 and 18 for single- and multiple-site visitors, respectively, for each botanic garden, resulting in an estimate of approximately 194millionforthetotalsocialwelfaregeneratedbytripstothethreesites.Marginalwillingnesstopay(WTP)foraccesstobotanicgardenswasalsoinvestigatedthroughpaymentvehiclesofentryfeesorhigherparkingchargesusingtheCVMcomponent.TheanalysisrevealedapositivemeanWTPofbetween194 million for the total social welfare generated by trips to the three sites. Marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for access to botanic gardens was also investigated through payment vehicles of entry fees or higher parking charges using the CVM component. The analysis revealed a positive mean WTP of between 3 and $5 per trip per person. The difference between the CVM and TCM results reflect the different underlying concepts of value under investigation: average CS per visit for the TCM and the utility arising from a marginal visit for the CVM. Marginal changes in CS from the TCM were derived. The confidence intervals from the TCM marginal values overlap the WTP estimates from the CVM. These findings will be useful for resource management decisions in the botanic gardens collection in Australia

    Valuing Australian botanic collections: a combined travel-cost and contingent valuation study

    No full text
    Economic values of biological collections in three Australian botanic gardens in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney were estimated using the travel-cost method (TCM) and the contingent valuation method (CVM). The TCM component of the study produced average per-trip consumer surplus (CS) values of 39and39 and 18 for single- and multiplesite visitors, respectively, for each botanic garden, resulting in an estimate of approximately 194millionforthetotalsocialwelfaregeneratedbytripstothethreesites.Marginalwillingnesstopay(WTP)foraccesstobotanicgardenswasalsoinvestigatedthroughpaymentvehiclesofentryfeesorhigherparkingchargesusingtheCVMcomponent.TheanalysisrevealedapositivemeanWTPofbetween194 million for the total social welfare generated by trips to the three sites. Marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for access to botanic gardens was also investigated through payment vehicles of entry fees or higher parking charges using the CVM component. The analysis revealed a positive mean WTP of between 3 and $5 per trip per person. The difference between the CVM and TCM results reflect the different underlying concepts of value under investigation: average CS per visit for the TCM and the utility arising from a marginal visit for the CVM. Marginal changes in CS from the TCM were derived. The confidence intervals from the TCM marginal values overlap the WTP estimates from the CVM. These findings will be useful for resource management decisions in the botanic gardens collection in Australia
    corecore